Free ToolBy GitIntel

ClickHouse vs DuckDB: The Analytics Database That Fits Your Scale

DuckDB for laptops to mid-scale, ClickHouse for petabytes — here's the honest comparison with real benchmark numbers.

GitIntel tracks AI-generated code across your entire git history — giving every tool on this page the attribution layer that standard dev tooling misses.

Try GitIntel free

DuckDB and ClickHouse are both columnar, vectorized analytical databases that outperform PostgreSQL and MySQL on OLAP queries by 10-100x. They're built for different scales and operational contexts, which makes the choice fairly clear once you know your requirements.

DuckDB is an embedded analytics database — it runs in-process in Python, R, Java, or Node.js with no server, no configuration, and no ongoing infrastructure. Zero external dependencies. Query a 10GB Parquet file with SQL in 2 seconds on a laptop. The MotherDuck benchmark (2024) shows DuckDB executing a standard TPC-H query at 1B rows in 4 seconds on a MacBook M2. This is faster than most cloud data warehouses for the same query. DuckDB reads Parquet, CSV, JSON, Iceberg, Delta Lake, and can query S3 directly. The limitation: single-machine, read-optimized (writes are slower than reads), and it doesn't distribute across nodes.

ClickHouse is a distributed OLAP server built for ingesting billions of rows and querying them at sub-second latency across petabytes. Cloudflare runs ClickHouse at 11 million inserts/second. Uber runs over 1 petabyte of data on ClickHouse. The query engine is extraordinarily fast on aggregations — counting distinct users over 30 days in a 500-billion-row table in under 2 seconds is a real production benchmark. ClickHouse Cloud starts at $0.00031/GB for compute and $0.023/GB/month for storage.

The decision tree: if your data fits on one machine (under 500GB), DuckDB is simpler, faster to start, and costs nothing. If you need shared access for a team (not embedded), need distributed horizontal scale, or are ingesting streaming data at high velocity, ClickHouse. The operational cost of running ClickHouse yourself is non-trivial — consider ClickHouse Cloud or a managed alternative (Tinybird, DoubleCloud) for teams without dedicated data infrastructure.

A common production pattern: use DuckDB locally for development and testing (query local Parquet/CSV), publish processed data to S3 Parquet, and use ClickHouse only for the production analytics API that serves dashboards. This keeps the expensive distributed system out of your development workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can DuckDB handle production data warehouse workloads?

For workloads under ~500GB on a single machine, yes. MotherDuck (managed DuckDB cloud) extends this to TB-scale with shared access across users. Several companies run DuckDB in production for analytics APIs, embedding it in their application server to query local Parquet files. The limitation is concurrent write throughput — DuckDB handles concurrent reads well but single-writer scenarios only.

How does ClickHouse compare to BigQuery and Redshift?

ClickHouse is faster than BigQuery and Redshift on most OLAP queries, especially those involving large aggregations over recent data. BigQuery wins on data lake integration (querying GCS directly) and serverless scale-to-zero pricing. Redshift wins in the AWS ecosystem with tight S3 and IAM integration. Self-hosted ClickHouse is significantly cheaper than either for sustained analytical workloads — 60-80% cost reduction is commonly reported.

Is DuckDB free?

DuckDB the library is free and open source (MIT license). MotherDuck, the managed cloud service, charges $0/month for the Developer tier (10GB storage) and $0.02/DuckDB-hour for compute on the Launch tier. There's no infrastructure cost for running DuckDB embedded in your application.

Start Using GitIntel Free

Open source. No account required. Works on any git repository.