Free ToolBy GitIntel

Supabase vs Firebase: The Backend-as-a-Service Comparison That Covers Cost

Both handle auth, database, and real-time out of the box — here's where they diverge and which scales cheaper.

GitIntel tracks AI-generated code across your entire git history — giving every tool on this page the attribution layer that standard dev tooling misses.

Try GitIntel free

Supabase and Firebase are both backend-as-a-service platforms that let you build without managing infrastructure. They cover the same surface area — auth, database, storage, real-time subscriptions, serverless functions — but with fundamentally different data models and cost structures.

Firebase Firestore is a document database optimized for mobile and real-time sync. Data is organized as collections of documents, and the real-time listener API lets clients receive updates in milliseconds. This makes Firebase excellent for chat applications, collaborative tools, and any product where live data sync across clients is a core feature. The Firebase SDK (especially on iOS and Android) is deeply mature. Authentication supports 12 providers out of the box. Cloud Functions extend the backend. The downside: Firestore's query model is restrictive — no full-text search, no aggregate queries across collections, no multi-collection joins. And the pricing structure charges per read/write operation, which can surprise teams — 1M document reads costs $0.06, but a dashboard page that reads 500 documents per visit at 10,000 daily active users = $30/day in reads alone.

Supabase is PostgreSQL with a REST/realtime API layer, auth, storage, and edge functions. You get the full power of SQL — joins, aggregations, full-text search, custom functions, triggers, row-level security. The real-time system uses PostgreSQL logical replication to stream changes, so you can subscribe to any SQL query result as a live stream. The free tier includes 500MB database, 1GB file storage, and 50K monthly active users for auth. Paid plans start at $25/month. Pricing is predictable because it's based on compute and storage, not per-operation.

The migration story matters: Firebase lock-in is real. The Firebase SDK has deep platform integration, and migrating off requires rewriting data access logic. Supabase uses PostgreSQL, which you can export and run anywhere.

Practical guidance: Firebase for mobile-first, real-time collaborative applications where the client SDK experience is paramount. Supabase for web applications, relational data requirements, teams with SQL experience, or anyone concerned about predictable pricing at scale.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Supabase free to start?

Supabase's free tier includes 500MB database storage, 1GB file storage, 50,000 monthly active users for authentication, and 500K edge function invocations per month. There's a 2-project limit on the free plan. Projects pause after 1 week of inactivity on free tier. The Pro plan at $25/month removes these limits and adds daily backups.

Can Firebase scale to millions of users?

Yes. Firebase and Firestore power applications at 100M+ user scale — it's Google infrastructure. The challenge isn't raw scale, it's cost predictability. At high read/write volume, Firestore's per-operation pricing becomes expensive relative to PostgreSQL-based alternatives. Teams that hit $5K+/month Firebase bills often find that moving to Supabase or a direct PostgreSQL stack cuts costs 60-80%.

Does Supabase support real-time data sync like Firebase?

Yes, through two mechanisms: Realtime subscriptions (listen to database changes via PostgreSQL logical replication) and Broadcast (publish/subscribe messaging without database persistence). The API is similar to Firebase's onSnapshot listener. The difference: Supabase real-time requires listening to specific table changes with SQL filters, while Firebase's real-time is document-centric and built into the core data model.

Start Using GitIntel Free

Open source. No account required. Works on any git repository.